[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[DIVERS] extra-terrrestres et secrets d'état
Bonjour,
j'ai copié ci-dessous un article que je trouve intéressant, pondéré,
intelligent et qui pose des questions justes par rapport au phénomène UFO :
December 21, 2004 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada - Last month in Las Vegas at the
MJ-12 UFO Crash/Retrieval Conference, Canadian researcher Grant Cameron and I
talked about several reasons why the U. S. government continues to sustain a
strict policy of denial about the extraterrestrial phenomenon even while it
has back engineered physical objects retrieved from several UFO crashes since
at least the early 1940s (For example, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, in 1941).
Recently Grant told me he is working on a paper for lecture presentations in
2005 that will list "64 Reasons Why the U. S. Government Hasn't Released
Truth About UFOs!" His list is not completed, but Grant talked to me for
Earthfiles and Dreamland about his growing list of non-disclosure reasons (27
listed below), in spite of his conviction that all humans deserve to know the
truth about other life in the universe interacting with our planet.
Interview:
Grant Cameron, a building facility manager at the University of Manitoba;
reporter and producer of www.presidentialufo.com, Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada:
"Why do the people whoever control this why have they decided to cover it
up? I've made two assumptions:
One is that they are not evil men. They might do evil things. They might be
deluded or whatever. But I think the majority of them are people who think
they are doing the best for the American people, or whoever they think they
are working on behalf.
Two, the other thing I assume is there is a process of discussion and review.
There have been numerous discussions about a possible split inside this
control group alleged to be MJ-12 (Majestic 12 appointed by President Harry
S. Truman). Supposedly some want to release and some people don't want to
release. Indirectly working in government here, I know if you are part of
government, you spend an awful lot of your time with policies and protocols
and procedures, so I am assuming there is some sort of processed paperwork.
It might be fifteen levels deep in security, but there is some sort of
process in which someone has sat down, looked at the whole UFO scene and the
ET visitations - all the different aspects - and have made a conscious
decision to say, 'No, we're not going to release it.'
Then I tried to look at if I were on their side and the prime example I always
use is if you take an honest man like Jimmy Carter. He went into the White
House, had seen a UFO, was determined when he got into the White House to
release the UFO files, went into the White House and it does appear that he
was briefed on the subject. Then, according to the actress Shirley MacLaine,
he said that it was true, there were occupants. He wanted to shine the
'sunshine laws' on the UFO subject to see how the people would react, but
that he could not and would not. That seems to indicate that he knew what the
story was and he had decided he couldn't and wouldn't release the UFO
secrets.
So, what I look at while I'm writing this article and what I've always thought
about is: If I were given the same briefing that Jimmy Carter was given,
would I change teams like Jimmy Carter did? We had a guy who actually was on
our side and went to their side. Why?
IF YOU WERE IN JIMMY CARTER'S SHOES, WHAT DO YOU THINK WOULD BE THE REASONS HE
DECIDED THAT KEEPING EVERYTHING SUPPRESSED IN A POLICY OF DENIAL IS STILL THE
BEST POLICY?
Jimmy Carter, I think, spelled it out himself why he decided to keep it a
secret. He made a statement that I think some people have not heard. He
stated that he was going to release the UFO files, but it had to do with
national security, secret weapons he referred to, that kind of stuff and
said, 'I wouldn't release that, but I have no problem releasing the UFO
files.'
So, if you are a briefer and you wanted to turn the President and every
President appears to have turned (to non-disclosure side) and every President
has gone along with this policy.
Reasons For Non-Disclosure
1) National security. Basically that sort of goes over all the 64 reasons it
can encompass all of them, the national security. That's the big one, the
main one, even though I haven't tried to rate them in terms of importance.
But national security in terms of if we released weapons information, if
foreigners get hold of this. The government insiders could easily tie this
into national security if we release the whole story. So, I think national
security is number one.
Inside national security, the government's priority is:
2) Weapons development and military's Need-To-Know elite.
3) Technology development lead time.
4) Reverse engineering. Back-engineering of alien technologies from UFO crash
retrievals and getting those technologies functional in the American space
and corporate-industrial programs and patents. (See book: The Day After
Roswell by Lt. Col. Philip J. Corso © 1989.) Trying to get as much done to
develop this technology before we have to release the truth. A Need To Know
policy it's a concept that the military has. It's sort of like, 'We're the
military and we're going to do the thinking and therefore, we have a need to
know and the general population does not. We are not going to release it
because it's part of the military. It's our secret. It's not part of what the
population should know.'
So you get this thing where someone has a TOP SECRET clearance. 'I am special
and I have this need to know.' You want to maintain this sort of special
status that you have.
Some of the other ones that I looked at were:
5) Complexity. When you start looking at all the 64 reasons, you realize that
the UFO situation and a lot of researchers know this, but the public does
not know this it is actually a very complex subject. It's not simply 'ET's
are here.' There are all sorts of complications in terms of abductions and
mutilations and all sort of things, crop circles. The more you look at it the
more complex it gets. That in itself is more reason why they are trying to
sit back and understand it better. It's a very complex thing and very hard to
explain to the people. That would be one of the reasons.
6) Abduction phenomenon. I think that is one of the key reasons they don't
release. George W. Bush just recently came to Canada. He made a speech in
Halifax, Nova Scotia. In that speech, he tried to promote the idea that
Canada should get involved with this space-based-weapons stuff. In there, he
stated that to keep our people safe, that is the most solemn duty I have.
Constitutionally, the President is responsible for the protection of the
American people. Some of the estimates of abduction numbers run to 6 to 8
million people. I think the President not only does not know how to stop
abductions, I don't think he even knows why abductions are taking place. So,
this is the kind of thing that you can't put the President or governments,
for that matter in front of people to make them look stupid. It's something
they can't deal with and they are postponing it until they can get control of
it.
7) Psychological warfare. If you look at the psychological warfare that's
involved in abductions, this is like candy to intelligence agencies that
you can actually abduct a foreign leader, go into his mind, find out what he
is thinking, feed stuff into his mind. This is very powerful stuff they might
want to work on behind the scenes.
8) Animal mutilations. It sort of confirms the fact that there is an evil
element to this thing. Even when I researched, people believed they were
angels of God, people who believed they were angels of the devil. The whole
mutilation thing gets into the fact there might be an evil element to the
alien presence.
OR EVEN JUST SURVIVAL THAT DEMANDS GENETIC HARVESTING. AND THE FACT THAT WE
ARE KEPT IN THE DARK AND UNCONSCIOUS ABOUT OUR PLANET AND ANIMALS AND
OURSELVES BEING HARVESTED IN AND OF ITSELF HAS A NEGATIVE UNDERBELLY.
Sure, it's scary stuff. The media people could really spin this whole thing to
make it look very bad.
SO ON OUR LIST, WE START WITH NATIONAL SECURITY, AND THEN WE GO TO ABDUCTIONS
THAT ARE VERY COMPLEX. AFTER THAT THE WORLDWIDE ANIMAL MUTILATIONS HAVE BEEN
GOING ON FOR AT LEAST 60 YEARS. AFTER YOU GET PAST THOSE THREE CATEGORIES,
CAN YOU TICK OFF WHAT OTHER ITEMS YOU HAVE ON YOUR GROWING LIST?
9) Alien cover-up. The aliens are covering up as well, which I'm sure disturbs
the American government to no end. Why are the aliens not releasing? And yet,
another one that involves that is: Are the aliens in control? Have the aliens
made, told the government to cover this thing up? Are they being controlled
like the "alien masters?" So there is this whole thing that the aliens aren't
releasing if they are staying in the background and not announcing
themselves, we're (human governments) not coming out first. There is this
fear of why the aliens are not there.
MEANING, WHY ARE THEY KEEPING IT SECRET AS WELL?
Exactly, and that makes for distrust. Or that the aliens might have actually
said, 'You can't release it.' We don't know. There might be something behind
the scenes where the aliens say you can't release it (because they are) the
"alien masters.'
10) Government gridlock: The whole thing that Whitley Strieber talked about
when he interviewed Lawrence Rockefeller. Lawrence Rockefeller, during the
Clinton administration, had tried to get the Clintons to release the UFO
story through declassifying everything. The Clintons we know were very
interested. Hillary was going through third parties to researchers. They were
very interested. But when Lawrence actually sat down with I think it was
Hillary. Some people say the President was there, but I don't think he was
there. Hillary was there and actually went through the briefing (with
Rockefeller) and described to her why UFOs should be released, why this is an
important subject. Hillary came back after the briefing the next morning and
said, 'Don't ever bring up the subject again.'
Part of that was that the Clintons were the people who wanted to release it,
but they couldn't release it. They already had Monica Lewinsky. They had all
sorts of scandals going. Hillary had been tied in with this Jean Houston out
of New York and channeling dead people (Eleanor Roosevelt). It was very
embarrassing, so it was something that even though they wanted to do it, the
Clinton Administration, it was a giggle factor thing where they didn't need
it. It wasn't something that was going to get them anywhere, so they
basically backed away from trying to force disclosure.
BUT YOUR IMPLICATION IS IN YOUR RESEARCH THAT CLINTON, THE PRESIDENT, DOES
KNOW MORE ABOUT SOMETHING HAVING TO DO WITH AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL PRESENCE ON
THE PLANET THAN HE HAS EVER ADMITTED?
Yes, and like everything else people don't realize the President does not
have so much power. He can't just come in and take an idea and bring it out.
That's not the way it works. You have to put it through Congress, you have to
have the backing of Congress. You have to have the lobbyists on your side.
There are all sorts of different things that are involved. Even though
Clinton wanted it, I was told inside the CIA that they (Hillary and Bill)
were both looking. They were very interested in UFOs. They were contacting
admirals and different people and asking them about UFOs. The Clintons were
very interested. Even when I was lecturing at the Ozark conference last year,
one woman came up to me and said her sister owned a barbecue restaurant where
Bill and Hillary went and that they had a UFO sighting. So, there are all
these indications of their interest. They asked Webster Hubble to go out and
get the information on UFOs. They had a number of indications that they tried
to get it and it was like they kept banging against the wall and finally
decided it was not worth it and gave up. They gave up on disclosure. They
tried, but it's the same as Jimmy Carter tried.
IF CLINTON AND CARTER WERE UNACCEPTABLE TO THE MJ-12 POWER CONTROLLERS ON THE
EXTRATERRESTRIAL BIOLOGICAL ENTITY STORY, WOULDN'T YOU THINK THAT GEORGE W.
BUSH, THE CURRENT PRESIDENT, WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE BECAUSE OF HIS CONSERVATIVE
STANCE? IF SO, DO YOU THINK THERE IS ANY CHANCE THAT THIS ET STORY, THE TRUTH
ABOUT IT OR AT LEAST THE BEGINNING TRUTH, COULD OPEN UP IN THIS SECOND ROUND
OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION?
I don't think so because of this: the Democrats want disclosure. It's like
Bill Clinton he talked about his new library that has a lot of glass and a
lot of light and this is to show that the Clinton Administration was an open
administration. They declassified 800 million pages of documents. That was
their thing. So was Jimmy Carter. The vast majority of documents we have
today came out during the Carter Administration. So, they wanted openness,
but because they were not liked by the military, they were cut out of the
loop. The Republicans, on the other hand, they have the power and association
with high ends of the military. The problem is that they work in an aspect of
secrecy. Dick Cheney, for example, the Vice President, one of his ideas is if
you have the three branches of government - the judiciary, the legislative
and the executive - he wants the executive branch to be stronger. Therefore,
you have a policy of no disclosure of any conversations of anything that goes
on inside the executive White House.
And that is the policy the Bush Administration has used. You want to work on
UFOs in secrecy because you don't want to air your dirty laundry, the things
that are going on, the disagreements, the things that are not working. You
want to work in secrecy and keep it away from other nations. That's the
mentality that the Republican Administration seems to have, sort of a
paranoid mentality about the fact that the world is out to get us and there
are evil forces in the world and we are called by God to do this. You saw it
in the Reagan Administration and in this Bush Administration. That's why even
though they have the power George W. Bush made Roswell jokes when he went
to Roswell, he made the joke about the unidentified object over town that
morning and then jokingly said, 'Oh, no, that was me in Air Force One.'
So he knows the story, he makes little jokes about it. He probably knows but
for him he would definitely see it as an aspect of military weapons
development, back engineering, the fact that we have terrorism. This might
help us to fight terrorism and North Korea and all the enemies we have around
the world. To do it, we have to do it in secrecy. We can't be leaking stuff
out. I think Dick Cheney is a big part of keeping things secret.
YOU AND I HAVE TALKED ABOUT WHAT SEEMS TO BE A PRETTY CLEAR INDICATION THAT
4-STAR GENERAL WESLEY CLARK HAS HAD SOME KIND OF BRIEFING ON THE UFO STORY.
IF HE HAS, WOULDN'T CHENEY, WOULDN'T BUSH, WOULDN'T THE CURRENT HIGH RANKING
PEOPLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE, ALL HAVE HAD A BRIEFING AS WELL?
Yes, I think all those people have been briefed. I asked Vice President Cheney
right after he came into the White House. I asked the briefing question: 'Mr.
Cheney, in all your jobs in government, have you ever been briefed on the
subject of UFOs? If so, when was it and what were you told?'
And he said, 'If I had been briefed on that subject' he did not mention the
name, he said 'that subject' 'it probably would have been classified and I
wouldn't be talking about it.' That comes down to the military aspect that
it's tied into national security. You have to have security in these programs
and I'm going to play the good role and not going to talk about it.
Wesley Clark was more indirect and tried to talk around the subject the same
as George Bush, Sr. He was asked on the campaign trail and he had been
Director of Central Intelligence the bushes are seen as very strong
leaders, going to war. But Bush when he came in was seen as a very weak Vice
President. he had been Director of the CIA. When he was asked by Charles
Hufford, 'Come on, you were CIA Director. You know what's going on. Are you
going to release the UFO information?' He said, 'Yes, I know a little bit.'
Almost what Wesley Clark had said, 'Yes, I know a little bit about what's
going on.'
SO NATIONAL SECURITY KEEPS COMING AROUND FULL CIRCLE AS ONE OF THE MAIN
REASONS WHY THIS COVER-UP HAS BEEN PERPETUATED FOR AT LEAST 60 YEARS FROM THE
TRUMAN ADMINISTRATION, MAYBE EVEN BEFORE. AND THE ANIMAL MUTILATIONS AND
ABDUCTION SYNDROME COMPLICATE THE ABILITY OF THIS GOVERNMENT, OR ANY
GOVERNMENT, TO OPEN UP THIS COMPLEX AND POSSIBLY DANGEROUS SUBJECT. ON YOUR
LIST OF TRYING TO SAY 64 REASONS FOR WHY THE POLICY OF DISCLOSURE SHOULD
STILL BE IN PLACE, WHAT ELSE IS ON YOUR LIST?
11) Population resistance. The fact that the population will resist any sort
of attempt to integrate aliens into society. They fear this. some of these
things are what people fear, they are not 100% sure, but we are better off
just leaving off. That's something government insiders are scared of
population resistance.
12) Collapse in belief systems. It's scientific people who are going to really
take a bath on suddenly realizing the vast majority of things they believed
are wrong.
13) Religious collapse. How are the Arabs going to deal with this, for
example? You can't just look at Americans. Worldwide, how are different
cultures going to deal with this whole scenario?
14) Past lying statements. The fact that you are tied into lying for 60 years,
you are sort of stuck. You have to keep telling one lie to cover up the other
lies of the past.
15) Old style conservatives. This is not a big issue. But, basically it's that
in religions, you have old style conservatives who resist. Thus, new ideas
aren't born; old ideas just die way. More and more of the young people
believe in ETs and the older people don't want new concepts. It's
conservatives that are blocking release of different truths.
16) Kick backs and profits. Behind the scenes is probably a very highly
classified program and there is probably a lot of money exchanging hands, a
lot of kickbacks, a lot of people who are going to fight tooth and nail to
keep the system the way it is because there are a lot of people making money
on the technology and what's going on. They are not going to give that up
without a fight.
17) Loss of power. Whether it's government or people running the thing, you
are going to lose if the system changes with the release of the
extraterrestrial truth. The people who are in power now are no longer going
to be in power. That's almost for certain. These people don't want the power
to shift away from them.
18) Dependence on oil. The entire economy is based on oil. It's the whole fact
that if we are so dependent, so used to oil-driven engines, that we can't
break that tie. We are so reliant upon oil it's almost like an addiction to a
drug. Another big reason tied to oil is:
19) Crash of the stock market. I believe the stock market would crash. I was
first warned about this when I used to study the guy, Wilbert Smith, who used
to run the Canadian government's UFO program. One of his close associates was
a military scientist who did the metallurgy work when pieces came up from the
United States to Canada to be analyzed. He did the metallurgic work. I had a
number of interviews with him back in the 1970s. He sort of stopped the
conversation and said, 'Grant, let me tell you something. I want to warn you
about something. If you know they are going to disclose the UFO story
tomorrow morning, I'm telling you, I'm warning you, sell everything you've
got today because tomorrow nothing is going to be worth anything. When you
think about that, it's actually true. The stock market works because people
are going to buy stocks according to what they think a stock will be worth
tomorrow. You want to make money on it. If you think a stock is going to be
worth less tomorrow, you're not going to buy the stock. As soon as the UFO
truth is released, stocks become worth literally nothing. Everybody who has
oil stocks will start to sell. Anyone who feels tied in, whether it's the car
industry, anything that has to do with engines they are going to figure 'I
have to get out before my thing melts down.'
So, why would the President and his advisers rock the boat? Why would they
take the big chance? We are doing OK. Let's spend another ten years, we can
get another pile of answers to abductions, mutilations, back-engineering ET
technologies and all the different things we're working on. If you disclose
ten years from now, we'll be a lot farther ahead in dealing with the problems
we're going to have and in back-engineering the technology than we are right
now. 'So, Mr. President, why take the chance? Why would you go out on the
limb and risk people panicking?'"
How Does U.S. Government Reverse
Its Policy of Lies and Denials About ETs
YOU CAN HEAR THAT DISCUSSION DECADE AFTER DECADE FROM TRUMAN AT LEAST UP TO
THE CURRENT DAY. GRANT, WHAT HAS CHANGED - IF ANYTHING - THAT MIGHT OPEN UP
THE TRUTH ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE'RE NOT ALONE IN THE UNIVERSE AND THAT THERE
HAVE BEEN OTHER INTELLIGENCES INTERACTING WITH THIS PLANET FOR MILLENNIA?
WHAT WOULD REVERSE THE LIES AND OPEN UP THAT TRUTH - LET'S SAY IN THE NEXT 20
YEARS?
Good question. I don't know. Basically, I think you are talking the same
things that have held it up. I can't really see unless they make a mistake.
My idea is to get a high ranking leader who has been briefed and confirms the
fact he was briefed, which leads you to a date, a briefing date, where you
can get a document. The document will have the truth, not the misinformation
they are putting out. It will have the actual truth of what is going on.
Government is very short-sighted. It's very 'Let's do things for the next four
years.' There is no long term thought inside of government because it is very
vote-oriented. I always say they look at the shortest distance between two
votes.
GRANT, WHAT YOU ARE JUST SUMMARIZING INDIRECTLY IS THE FACT THAT IT WILL
PROBABLY BE ANOTHER 60 YEARS BEFORE ANY OF THE REAL TRUTH WILL OPEN UP ON
THIS PLANET.
Yes, unless there is some sort of accident, a crash retrieval they can't
control, or some aspect where somebody gets the idea that this is for real
some media that is not controlled by the government. And I think a lot of
them are controlled by the government. Somebody might break ranks and say
we're going to put this story out, we're going to do it and it snowballs from
there. It has to be something outside the ordinary because right now, it's
status quo. Things are going along, no one is asking any questions, no one
seems to be interested. It really doesn't get into the media.
THAT'S THE HUMAN SIDE OF THE EQUATION. FOR A MOMENT, WHAT IS YOUR PRIVATE,
PERSONAL OPINION ABOUT WHY ON THE NON-HUMAN SIDE OF THE EQUATION, THERE WOULD
NOT BE SOME KIND OF BLATANT PRESENTATION THAT WOULD PULL THE RUG OUT FROM
UNDER OUR GOVERNMENT AND ALL GOVERNMENTS OF THE PLANET?
You hear about the concept of universal law that you can't interfere with
someone else's evolution. They are sitting back and watching. You'll see a
number of cases Bentwaters and Rendlesham Forest, for example. When we were
in Las Vegas, this discussion about the fact that the alien presence there
sent a beam down through all this concrete and metal and disarmed the nuclear
weapons the Americans had in the United Kingdom that should not have been
there. The aliens are basically sitting on the sidelines and will step in if
there is a nuclear war. But otherwise, they are going to let us make the
mistakes that we have. They are going to have gradual disclosure as well.
They are sort of indicating indirectly to us through people who get
discredited that there is an alien presence, and allowing people to gradually
acclimatize themselves to the fact that they are there. They must realize the
same thing about panic and all those issues.
BUT, ISN'T THERE AN IMMEDIATE CONTRADICTION TO THAT PERSPECTIVE IN THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF HUMAN ABDUCTIONS AND ANIMAL MUTILATIONS WHICH ARE PHYSICAL
INTRUSIONS IN HUMANS AND ANIMALS?
But it's still done in the background. It's not like the aliens take 500
cattle and fly into downtown New York City and drop them where everyone can
see them. It's still done in the background. it's very indirect. You and I
can link it. We put the pieces together, but it's not directly linked for the
public. It's sort of done indirectly. It's like you are trying to prove that
it's going on. I've always said that if they wanted to announce themselves,
they could announce themselves. They could land in 5 or 6 cities all at the
same time. They could control the whole thing and come out and say, 'Here we
are.' And they don't. That's what scares the government. That's my impression
of why the aliens don't: there is a law of non-interference. This is
disagreed with in the animal mutilations and abductions which confuse me as
well how does this fit in? It's like a little bit of interference with our
evolution, but it's sort of passes like an exception to the rule. It confuses
me.
WHAT SHOULD ALSO BE ON OUR LIST IS THE COMPLEXITY OF AGENDAS AND THE FACT THAT
IT SEEMS TO BE INCREASINGLY CLEAR THERE ARE MANY MORE THAN ONE INTELLIGENCES
INTERACTING WITH OUR PLANET. ONCE YOU GET A CLEAR FOCUS ON MORE THAN ONE
INTELLIGENCE, AND THAT THERE ARE MORE AGENDAS, THEN THE COMPLEXITY RATCHETS
UP SO HIGH THAT FOR ANY OF US HUMANS, INCLUDING THE GOVERNMENT, TO UNDERSTAND
WHAT ANY ONE INTELLIGENCE AND ITS AGENDA MIGHT BE IS ALMOST NOT POSSIBLE FOR
HUMANS THAT ARE LIVING ON THIS EARTH.
20) Alien agenda incomprehensible. Yes, and that's one of the big reasons
the government does not fully understand the alien agenda that the aliens
haven't made it public to the government. It might in the end be a take over.
That cold be one of the scenarios, through abductees and through genetic
manipulation, that they are going to interbreed and take over. That is always
one of the scenarios.
21) Alien intelligences deceive. ONE GUY WHO WORKED FOR THE MILITARY AND INTEL
TOLD ME BACK IN THE EARLY 1980S, 'LINDA, THE GREYS LIE TO US. WE KNOW THEY
LIE.' THAT CAUGHT ME OFF GUARD BECAUSE I THINK THE NAIVE IMPRESSION MOST
HUMANS HAVE IS THAT SOMETHING FROM SOME PLACE ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE THAT IS
ADVANCED ENOUGH TO TRAVEL FROM FAR AWAY TO GET HERE WOULD SOME HOW BE MORE
MENTALLY, SPIRITUALLY ADVANCED AND THAT THERE WOULD NOT BE MANIPULATION OR
DECEPTION OR LIES.
That's one thing about the aliens. They don't seem to be much more spiritually
advanced than we are.
OR AT LEAST SOME OF THEM. THEN YOU TALK TO SOME PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAD
INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER INTELLIGENCES THAT SEEM TO BE VERY ADVANCED AND MORE
INTERESTED IN SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION THAN ANYTHING PHYSICAL. IT'S THIS
COMPLEXITY, THIS CONFUSION, THAT REIGNS AS MUCH AT THE END OF 2004 AS WE HEAD
INTO 2005 AS IT DID BACK IN 1947.
22) Government does not know what to do about ETs. Yes, and back in 1950, one
of the reasons that ties in with this: Wilbert Smith ran the Canadian
government's flying saucer investigation. He talked a number of times about
why the government had covered it up and he said it was very simple: They
(govt) did not know what to do. He said that when they realized the existence
of the saucers and people from elsewhere, they didn't know what to do about
it, couldn't control it, and they closed their eyes and hoped it would go
away.' They simply did not know what to do. That is one of the things: they
are throwing their hands up, it's out of their control and the best thing is
not to let everybody know you can't control it.
AND TO HOPE THAT IT GOES AWAY WHAT A NAIVE POSITION! ESPECIALLY 60 YEARS
LATER, REALIZING THAT ANIMAL MUTILATIONS AND HUMAN ABDUCTIONS AND A MYRIAD
OTHER MORE COMPLEX PIECES OF EVIDENCE THAT SOMETHING INTERACTS WITH OUR
PLANET AND IS STILL HERE, NOT GOING AWAY, AND WHEN IS THIS WORLD GOING TO BE
TOLD THE TRUTH?
Yes. And another reason for non-disclosure that I have is:
23) Nationalism. Especially when you consider that the U. S has a lot of the
UFO technology and a lot of nationalism. If you go to a world view of aliens
versus us, nationalism is out. But nationalism is a big thing in the USA. If
you are the American government, it's hard to accept your government is not
going to exist anymore. It's going to be a world government and you're just
going to be a little puppet doing what you are being told by a world
government. So, nationalism is something the USA does not want to give up.
The Brookings Institution 1961 Report
24) Advanced intelligences absorb/defeat less advanced intelligences. The
Brookings study on the implications of discovery of extraterrestrial life and
intelligence talked about extinction. This is the idea that if you get an
advanced civilization and a non-advanced civilization (which would be us),
the one that is less advanced could become extinct.
Editor's Note: Page 215 of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs by The
Brookings Institution, dated April 18, 1961, states: "... anthropological
files contain many examples of societies sure of their place in the universe,
which have disintegrated when they had to associate with previously
unfamiliar societies espousing different ideas and different life ways.
Others that survived such an experience usually did so by paying the price of
changes in values and attitudes and behavior."
April 18, 1961, report for NASA by The Brookings Institution.
This is the idea of the Native Indian. When the white man came, that Indian
society just fell apart. That's probably in the back ground of the briefings
that this is a very likely scenario and would mean to the President, 'I['m
just not going down this road.' This is something we'd have a hard time
dealing with if it turns out to be true.
GRANT, DOES THIS MEAN THAT THERE IS NO DISCLOSURE ABOUT OTHER LIFE IN THE
UNIVERSE IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE BECAUSE IT IS SO POLITICALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO
OPEN UP?
Yes, I think there are so many scenarios they are unsure of, or they know for
a fact are going to cause trouble, that when you weigh the way the world is
right now versus all the things that could go wrong! And a government wants
to be in control. I always say disclosure is like a snowball going down a
hill. Once you disclose all you have to say is 'ETs are real.' The snowball
starts going down the hill and you could get an avalanche. At that point, you
can no longer control it and it's a situation where, for example, it green
lights everything. If the President said, 'ETs are here, but I'm not going to
talk about the rest of it.' That would automatically green light all the
people that you've talked to, Linda; that I've talked to; all those inside
the Intel community who say, 'OK, now it's open. The President has said this
is for real.' They start talking and you can't control what they are going to
say.
It's something that once it's out of the bag, it's out! Now they can control
it by indirectly leaking material with misinformation to indirectly tell us
what is going on. But once you confirm it, then you have this massive rush of
reporters and people who demand answers and it's something you totally lose
control over; the government wants to be in control. If you take a look at
President Reagan when he was shot, the National Security Adviser advised
minutes after Reagan was shot that the more people think things are normal,
the better off we are going to be. You want to keep people thinking that
nothing has changed. If you change the scenario that's changed, this is
changed the stock market is moving down, a hundred different things it
gets out of control.
IT'S LIKE Orwell's 1984 IN WHICH THE LIE HAS BECOME THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH
HAS BECOME THE LIE.
Yes.
HOW DO WE UPEND THAT AND HAVE THE TRUTH BE THE TRUTH?
Exactly. One of the scary things I've looked at for one of the possible
reasons is:
25) Counter-measures - Space-based weapons to fight ETs. The government might
actually be stupid enough to say that it can develop weapons in order to
handle the alien situation by wiping them out that we could actually win in
a war against the aliens that the government is working on counter-measures
to go after the aliens. If that is true - and I think it looks like they
actually are working on that kind of stuff - this is total stupidity. Clinton
was asked after the movie Independence Day in 1996, 'Mr. President, do you
think we would win a war against the aliens?' And he said, 'Yes, I think the
people would come together and we would win.'
I hope he was joking when he said that, but that's a scary scenario that a lot
of the secrecy is the fact that we are going to go to war against the aliens.
BUT HOW COULD WE ASSUME SUCH A POINT OF VIEW WHEN THE NON-HUMANS CAN
NEUTRALIZE GRAVITY?
Exactly. We would have to make the assumption that they have a certain amount
of technology to go to war and then find out that they have ten times that
and they just wipe us off the map, which would be a scary scenario. And yet
you look at the whole Star Wars "anti-missile shield" thing. It's being built
and yet there is no country that can launch a missile against the United
States and you sit there and ask: What are they (U.S. government) actually
doing? Why are they spending billions and billions of dollars on this stuff
that doesn't seem to work, but they are determined to get it up there and
take a war into space?
U. S. National Missile Defense System -
"Unknown Anomaly" Causes Test Failure
Thursday, December 16, 2004, Page A16 Headline, Albuquerque Journal,
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Editor's Note: The phrase, "unknown anomaly" is reminiscent of a similar
phrase, "peculiar phenomena" used by Lt. Col. Harold R. Turner to describe
what caused the May 1947 White Sands V-2 rocket tests to veer off course.
===========================================================
Liste de diffusion UMMO "DIVERS" (Tout ce qui n'entre pas dans les 4 autres listes).
Pour envoyer un message: soit fonction "répondre", soit
mailto:ummo.open@ummo-sciences.org
Soumis à la charte:
https://www.ummo-sciences.org/nvle_charte.htm
Archives de la liste:
http://archives.ummo-sciences.org/ml/ummo.open-AAAAMM/maillist.html ( en remplacant AAAA par l'année et MM par le N° du mois)
Pour se désinscrire :
mailto:ummo.open_request@ummo-sciences.org?subject=unsubscribe
===========================================================
--=_Listar-UnMime-Boundary--